Tags

, ,

The recorded television statement from President Uhuru Kenyatta broadcast on Tuesday on the
Sunday night raid that killed nearly 50 people in Mpeketoni township in Lamu county added an alarming political dimension to Kenya’s recent
security problems.

The President was pointing the finger directly, even without mentioning names, at opposition leader Raila Odinga, who since returning from a three month visit to the United States has led a series of
high-profile political rallies to press demands for a national conference on problems afflicting Kenya.

It should be logical then that the President follow-up his startling accusations with action, that
naturally should include arrest of Mr Odinga and others he accuses of such horrific crimes.

Although Interior Cabinet Secretary Joseph ole Lenku had on Monday alluded to political incitement, his statement was largely received with
skepticism, as a reckless attempt to divert attention to the political opposition when Kenya is facing serious security challenges.

The President echoing his Cabinet Secretary’s assertion added authority to what is now the
official position; That the Mpeketoni attack was not the work of the Somalia-based Al Shabbab terrorist
as initially believed, but the Cord leadership –“reckless leaders and hate-mongers, who … create
hate, intolerance and fanaticism”.

The President referred more or less directly to the Cord rallies, the last in Mombasa on the afternoon
prior to the Mpeketoni attack, as forums for “frenzied political rhetoric laced with ethnic profiling of some Kenyan communities and obvious
acts of incitement to lawlessness and possible violence.”

An interesting gist of the president’s statement was that the Cord rallies set out to demonise certain communities and incite other Kenyans to violence against them.

This is a clear reference to the president’s own Kikuyu community, who have borne the brunt of attacks at the Cord rallies for allegedly
monopolizing key positions in the public service,and to some extent also the Kalenjin community of
Deputy President William Ruto.

The suggestion, then, was that the Mpeketoni attack was not just a random action, but one targeted directly at the Kikuyu, a unique majority population in the settlement scheme established in
the 1960 in the Coast region by President Jomo Kenyatta.

The reference to ethnic profiling and deliberate targeting of the Kikuyu stood out in the statements
from both Present Kenyatta and Mr ole Lenku.

The interesting thing is that the allusions to an ethnic angle predate the Mpeketoni attack.

In the run-up to Mr Odinga’s much-hyped return from the US at the end of May, Jubilee social media activists went into overdrive on Twitter and
Facebook in what looked like a coordinated offensive to depict the Kikuyu under attack.

Early in May, four people died when a Chania Bus Services bus that had just arrived in Mombasa was hit in a grenade attack.

Soon after in Nairobi, four more people were killed in bomb attacks on two buses plying the busy Thika Highway that links the capital city and Central Kenya.

Then in the middle of May, the busy open-air Gikomba in Nairobi famous for imported second-hand clothes was hit in a deadly bomb attack that
killed about a dozen people.

That seemed to serve as a signal for the social media offensive pushing the common thread that the three attacks, Chania Bus, Thika Road and
Gikomba market targeted Kikuyu interests, and therefore could not have been perpetrated by Al
Shabbab terrorists who have little interests in partisan Kenyan politics.

The near unanimous conclusion from the social media deluge seemed to be that the three attacks must have been the outcome of a domestic political agenda that seeks to undermine the leadership of
President Uhuru Kenyatta and Deputy President William Ruto.

At about the same time as the Gikomba attack,some key western nations, notably the US and
Britain, upgraded their travel advisories on Kenya,cautioning their citizens of the threat of terrorist
attacks and specifically warning against travel to the popular tourist resorts at the Coast.

Economic sabotage

Images of British tour companies evacuating their clients from the Coast as a result of the warning
were widely broadcast internationally, giving the impression of a country under the threat of
imminent attack and facing complete security breakdown.

The government, understandably, was furious, insisting that it had not been not informed of any specific threat.

It took the advisories, especially the
evacuations, as deliberate sabotage of the lucrative tourism industry.

An angry President Kenyatta publicly denounced the travel warning and said that the western tourists were free to go as Kenya could source
tourists elsewhere.

It happened that the bad blood between Kenya and Western governments over the travel advisories came in the wake of the highly successful state visit by Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang.

Soon enough the blogosphere was abuzz with conspiracy theories suggesting that the travel advisories amounted to deliberate ‘economic
sabotage’ as western retaliation for Kenya’s growing business links with China.

The spate of financing and infrastructure development agreements sealed by President
Kenyatta and Premier Li were cited as evidence that the West had reason to punish Kenya after
losing out on lucrative deals it previously monopolised.

At around the same time, Cord was beating the drums for Mr Odinga’s anticipated return from the US, which was to be marked by a major rally at Uhuru Park.

Also brought into the mix was the International Criminal Court indictments of President Kenyatta
and Mr Ruto, which their supporters fervently believe were engineered Mr Odinga and his western patrons in an abortive bid to block the Jubilee duo from ascending to power.

The confluence of events seemed tailor-made for the Jubilee social media brigades, and soon enough
the ongoing blitz made an association between Mr Odinga and his American links, the bombing
allegedly targeting Kikuyu interests, and the political drive he was set to launch on return.

By the time Mr Odinga came back to star at the huge Uhuru Park rally, Twitter and Facebook were aflame as supporters of the ruling Jubilee and the opposition Cord coalitions went for each other in vitriolic attacks laced with ethnic venom and
threats to violence.

Out in the respective Jubilee and Cord strongholds across the country, the situation was equally poisonous; as propaganda and hate messages
driven initially on social media seemed to have spread to ordinary people in villages and townships
all over.

Mr Odinga’s main message at the Uhuru Park rally was the demand for a National Dialogue on critical
national problems such as security and terrorism,youth unemployment, tribalism, corruption and the
economy.

He however threatened to launch as series of public rallies to take discussion to the people if the
government rejected dialogue.

Jubilee supporters were not amused by what they saw as threats to launch mass action, which to
many was the sort of activities that preceded the post-election violence of 2007-2008.

Intemperate language

The intemperate language employed in Uhuru Park and subsequent rallies already staged ahead of Saba Saba, July 7, angered and alarmed Jubilee
supporters who interpreted some of the messages as signalling an imminent push to oust the
government through mass action.

Again, links were made to Mr Odinga’s fabled penchant for demonstrations, possibly violent, and the western-sponsored ‘Arab Spring’ that ousted governments across North Africa – Libya, Tunisia
and Egypt.

#Mpeketoniattack proof was offered for the growing narrative linking Mr Odinga to terrorist attacks, an anti-Kikuyu offensive and western-backed push against the Uhuru-Ruto regime, but the Jubilee heartland eagerly lapped up the propaganda.

In parts of central Kenya and the Rift Valley, the government looked on without intervening as Jubilee Governors, MPs and other political leaders launched vicious public attacks against Mr Odinga,
purporting to ban Cord rallies in their jurisdictions and even priming the youth to violently repulse any supposedly anti-government activity.

By the time the Mpeketoni attack came about, it was almost as if to confirm the prevailing narrative
about a domestic anti-Kikuyu plot.

President Kenyatta’s statement now takes that out of the murky realm of Jubilee social media activism and
soapbox political rhetoric and elevates it to the official government position on a key national
security issue.

The president warned of strong action against the politicians who are allegedly behind terrorist
attacks previously attributed to Al Shabbab and supposedly planning similar acts of destabilisation.

The warnings indicate that the government cannot sit on its hands and do nothing if it indeed knows
those responsible for mass murder in the Mpeketoni attack.

The prevailing view in the Jubilee government, as seen when the Senate went into a special session
on Tuesday to debate the Mpeketoni attack, is that Mr Odinga is responsible for serious crimes and
must be arrested and punished.

Outside statements driven by political fever, however, the question must still be asked whether the government actually has any evidence on which to act against Mr Odinga and his Cord colleagues.

It will be noted that a government known to be slow to investigate and take action on a long catalogue
of very serious crimes moved at superfast speed to point the finger at Mr Odinga even before
investigators had reached Mpeketoni pointing to prior intelligence reports that will be rubished by Raila based on Ethnic constitution of security apparatus in the Country.

Dangerous political situation

The emerging scenario points to a dangerous political situation that could easily escalate to violence if not well managed.

Politicians seem keen to goad their supporters into freelance counter-actions, as seen with the brief blockade on Nairobi’s Ngong Road by Jubilee supporters on Monday targeting Mr Odinga, and the purported bans on Cord rallies being
pronounced by Jubilee political leaders.

The speeches in the Senate on Tuesday were strong with demands from Jubilee MPs that the
planned Cord rallies be banned across the country, but experience shows that banning rallies for
unclear security reasons is often what leads to violence.

At the same time, government security operatives at the highest levels were keenly feeding the media
with ‘leaks’ from classified Intelligence signals on threats off attacks against Kikuyu residents and
businesses in Kisumu, Bungoma and other Cord strongholds.

The purported signals reported that the two towns had been ‘flooded’ with troopers from the Kenya
Police paramilitary General Service Unit to deter such attacks, but checks by reporters on the ground indicated the information was false.

However the same information was on social media rapidly spread by Jubilee adherents to feed the growing paranoia and state of siege.

If the Mpeketoni massacre came to fit neatly into a scenario that was already developing, Cord leaders
accused of bearing responsibility might well wonder if the stunning development bears any resemblance to President Moi’s warnings in 1990
that the multi-party campaign would result in violence.

It turned out to be a fulfilling prophecy, as his regime plotted the infamous Rift Valley ethnic clashes that were a precursor to the last bout of post-election violence that has President Kenyatta and Deputy President William Ruto in the dock at
the International Criminal Court.

CORD too is chest-thumping about a “storm that is coming” if no dialogue is held.

Has CORD turned into homegrown Al Shaabab,or they are foolish enough to co-opt Al Shaabab,just like they have done with Mungiki and MRC who are now under one central command of Mister Odinga?

“The African Story as told by Africans”.©African News Digest®

Advertisements